Johnny Jones and the Undercover Unit Case Study

Johnny Jones andthe Undercover Unit Case Study

Individualsexperience ethical dilemmas in completely different lines of work,professions, and all kinds of situations. Zgheib (2015) defines anethical dilemma as a situation in which a person is required to makechoices that may end up challenging his or her ethical principles.The person may also make a decision that may end up jeopardizingcritical elements of his or her life. This being the case,individuals must be rational at all times whenever they are facedwith an ethical dilemma. This way, they will not be forced useemotions to make a critical decision, which could put them at risk.

Several ethical dilemmas are in this case, which requires answers ofdifferent sizes and magnitudes. For instance, one of the main ethicaldilemmas affects Johnny Jones` family life. Hoggett et al. (2009)noted that a family offers one with the necessary support needed toperform better at work and in any profession. Problems within afamily often trickle down to a person`s work since they tend toaffect other people`s emotions and the ability to apply judgment inthinking rationally. For example, Johnny may have been successful,but his successes are affected by his issues with his wife andchildren. Johnny faces a dilemma, which requires him to eitherdisregard his superiors` call to report neither to work at theexpense of his wife and children nor to focus on his work over thefamily. Additionally, the number of working hours refuses him ampletime to spend with his family, which Hoggett et al. (2009) refers toas &quotfamily neglect.&quot

Inthis case, the ethical dilemma is not necessarily or wholly becauseof the working conditions. As a matter of fact, Johnny is partly toblame for his family issues since he chooses to go drinks with hisworkmates after shifts. Here, Johnny can opt to go to his family tomake up for his absence, but instead, he chooses to go out with hiscolleagues for evening drinks. Again, a new supervisor can come upwith individual social reviews and profiles of colleagues at work.This move can assist with the identification signs to determinesocial challenges since, according to Pollock (2007), such issues canplay a critical role in the officers` work performances.

Additionally, the supervisor may go through the shifts frequently toallow the police officers ample time to be with their families. Andfor officers on off-duty or leave, they ought to be called to workonly when it is critical. Moreover, the supervisor may also plan tohave special forums or platforms where the officers` families canhook up and share experiences. Such occasions may also require theservices of counselors to assist the families to adaptpsychologically to the pressures and the working conditions of theirmates. Discrepancies with his wife over Johnny`s working hours haveled to him avoiding to go home immediately after work. As for the newsupervisor, he should try to make working hours flexible enough forofficers, more so those with wives and children to make sure thatthey attend to their loved ones` demands accordingly.

Zgheib (2015) observed that within a criminal justice system, thepower of honesty is highly valued a virtue. This attribute ensuresthat there is a high level of transparency in the plans andprocedures of making sure fairness, as well as justice, deliversjustice. Those individuals in the justice system ought to carry outtheir mandates in a way that it is more likely to exude credibilityand a good image in the general public eyes, which is served by thesystem. In this case, Johnny demonstrated a lack of honesty at workwhen he obliged to attest that his partner, Tony, had given aninformant $50 as payment for the part she played in helping hisfellow officer to make substantial progress in handling a drug case.

Even though Johnny did not witness the transaction being drawnbetween his partner and the informant, he went ahead and signed thatthe operation did take place simply for him and his partner to be onthe supervisor`s good books. Johnny had experienced an ethicaldilemma. The dilemma was whether to oblige and attest to paying $50to the informant or refusing to acknowledge whether the transactiontook place. For obvious reasons, Johnny ended up signing the receipt.The reason being that his partner was the one who had taken shown himhow the criminal justice system when he was still new to work.

Additionally, both of them had worked together on some projects andhad gotten acquitted with each other`s style of operation, and thusJohnny chooses to sign the receipt for friendship`s sake. However,honesty ought to have prevailed because, according to Hoggett et al.(2009), it defines the ethical standards of any institution.Moreover, a new supervisor would be needed to demonstrate the highestlevel of transparency and honesty so that his leadership skills wouldbe by an example. Again, honesty as a virtue should be incorporatedinto the institution`s culture such that it becomes part of theeveryday conversation. This way, its relevance remains alive in theminds of the colleagues thus increasing its level of adoption.

In this case, Johnny faces another ethical dilemma, which is hisfailure to attend church service. Earlier on, he was devoted tochurch and its activities before he was shifted to the Department ofnarcotics. In the department, he may have acquired certain valuesthat may have led to his inability to refrain from excessive drinkingof alcohol. This ethical dilemma is by far a contributing issue tohis family problems. Here, drinking may have inhibited his ability tocarry out his duties as a father and husband.

Other work-related functions have altered Johnny`s ability to executehis duties while at home. For example, Johnny is not able to work onthe lawns and the compound since he spends a considerable amount oftime in weightlifting sessions with his workmates at work. Hisabsence did not go well, especially with his wife whose frustrationsled to her hiring another person to work on the lawns on his behalf.Johnny is, at this point, faced with an ethical dilemma. He isrequired to make a choice between attending to the compound and thelawns and focusing on weightlifting sessions.

The essence of Johnny engaging in physical fitness cannot bedisregarded given the demands of his work. Because of his work, hemust be physically and emotionally fit. This fitness will allow himto conduct surveillance attentively, make strenuous and arduousarrests. His family duties, on the other hand, form a firm pillar forhis operations as a monitoring officer and can be easily disregarded.This ethical dilemma can only be solved by Johnny through separationof engaging in weightlifting sessions and attending to lawns. Thisway, he will be in a better position to strike a balance betweenfamily and work.

Johnny`s ability to challenge policies and decisions by themanagement is an ethical problem in itself, which can affect theoverall working conditions of the parties involved. In mostprofessions, dissatisfaction levels are bound to happen because ofthe people`s diversity and preferences (Pollock, 2007). However, suchlevel of dissatisfaction ought to be addressed in an ethical mannerto avoid worsening the situation. Additionally, Johnny should act inan ethical way by following the right procedures or channels topresent his grievances. Again, to talk openly while he is with hiscolleagues may be viewed as an incitement, which may result in alegal case or termination of work. The new supervisor can avoidengaging in such agreements by establishing a platform or forum wheregrievances are professionally handled.

In conclusion, the paper is a case study that focuses on ethicaldilemmas. Johnny is at the center of the case and is required to makecritical decisions involving his work and family. These ethicaldilemmas arise because of the employees` ability to make criticaldecisions regarding their job and family. However, they are exposedto risks of having to choose between two instances. These situationscan be daunting and challenging as is the case with Johnny. As isdemonstrated in the paper, individual ethical decisions are harder tocomprehend fully than others. The ability to know how to handle suchissues at the workplace and home can improve one`s decision-makingskills and effectiveness. Additionally, such efficiency and expertisecan assist to keep one to be on the right side of the every situationinvolving work and family.

References

Hoggett, P., Mayo, M., &amp Miller, C. (2009). The dilemmas ofdevelopment work: Ethical challenges in regeneration. Bristol:Policy Press.

Pollock, J. M. (2007). Ethical dilemmas and decisions in criminaljustice. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.

Zgheib, P. (2015). Business Ethics and Diversity in the ModernWorkplace.